Welcome to CrownBio’s Oncology Blog where we share our thoughts
on the latest trends and hot stories in Oncology


What's Next for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: TIM-3?

by Ludovic Bourré, PhD, October 5, 2017 at 02:31 PM | Tags

Unlike negative regulators, such as PD-1 and CTLA-4 (which have been proposed as therapeutic targets in different cancer types) the function of TIM-3 (T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3) in cancer has just begun to be studied and little is known about its role.

TIM Protein Family Involved in Apoptosis

The TIM protein family is composed of three members in humans (hTIM1, 3, and 4) and eight in mice (mTIM1-8). TIM proteins are type-I cell surface glycoproteins composed of a signal peptide, an extracellular IgV domain, a mucin-like domain, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular cytoplasmic tail.

All members share a conserved sequence homology in the IgV domain, while other domains demonstrate poor homology. The IgV domains of all hTIM proteins contain a high-affinity binding site for PS, a phospholipid constituent of eukaryotic membranes [1, 2].

Generally present on the cytosolic side of the plasma membrane lipid bilayer, upon the onset of apoptosis PS is translocated to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane, making the cell a target for scavenger receptors on phagocytes [3, 4].

TIM-3 has Both Positive and Negative Regulatory Functions in Immune Response

TIM proteins are also implicated in the regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses. Particularly, TIM-3 is expressed on CD4+ T cells that secrete interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), CD8+ T cells, Treg, and innate immune cells (DC, NK cells, and monocytes). TIM-3 has also been proposed as a regulator of the Th1 type immune response. Evidence suggests TIM-3 has both negative and positive regulatory functions on diverse components of the immune response.

In cancer patients, TIM-3 is upregulated on tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and CD8+ TIL [5-7]. Administration of TIM-3 mAbs increases proliferation and cytokine production by tumor antigen-specific T cells [5-7].

Cancer Cells also Express TIM-3, Associated with Disease Progression and Decreased Survival Times

However, TIM-3 expression is not restricted to mononuclear cells, as it has also been detected expressed on distinct types of cancer cells, for example myeloid leukemia, sarcoma, gastric, cervical, and pulmonary cancer, and osteosarcoma. In many of these types of cancer, the increased expression of TIM-3 has been associated with disease progression and shorter survival.

Preclinical Studies Show Potential of Anti-TIM-3 and Checkpoint Inhibitor Combination Therapy

In preclinical models, TIM-3 has been shown to be upregulated on TIL in mouse tumor models such as the CT-26 colon adenocarcinoma, 4T1 mammary adenocarcinoma, and B16-F10 melanoma models. Administration of TIM-3 mAbs alone had only a modest antitumor effect; however, combination of anti-TIM-3 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies significantly suppressed tumor growth [7].

Another preclinical study showed that TIM-3 mAb injection slowed tumor progression in many mouse tumor models (e.g. MC38 colon carcinoma, WT3 sarcoma, CT-26 colon adenocarcinoma, and TRAMP-C1 prostate tumor). Furthermore, combinations of TIM-3 mAbs and CTLA-4 mAbs, or TIM-3 mAbs and PD-1 mAbs had a much greater antitumor effect.

These studies both support the potential of blocking TIM-3 in combination with other immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment [8, 9].

Clinical Development is at an Early Stage

Currently, only two TIM-3 antagonistic monoclonal antibodies are in early-phase clinical development (MBG453 and TSR-022). The safety and efficacy of MGB453 (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) is being evaluated in the first-in-human, Phase I-Ib/II open-label multi-center study as a single agent and in combination with PD-1 mAbs in adult patients with advanced malignancies (NCT02608268).

TSR-022 (TESARO, Waltham, USA) is currently being evaluated as a single agent again in a first-in-human Phase I trial in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT02817633), which will move on to explore the safety and clinical activity of TSR-022 as a monotherapy as well as in combination with an anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with selected tumor types.

These trials will be watched with great interest for both safety and efficacy readouts, to see if TIM-3 could be the next big thing in immune checkpoint inhibitors.

References and Further Reading on TIM-3:

  1. Kobayashi et al. TIM-1 and TIM-4 glycoproteins bind phosphatidylserine and mediate uptake of apoptotic cells. Immunity. 2007;27(6):927-40.
  2. DeKruyff et al. T cell/transmembrane, Ig, and mucin-3 allelic variants differentially recognize phosphatidylserine and mediate phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. J Immunol. 2010;184(4):1918-30.
  3. Schlegel, Williamson . Phosphatidylserine, a death knell. Cell Death Differ. 2001;8(6):551-63.
  4. Ravichandran. Beginnings of a good apoptotic meal: the find-me and eat-me signaling pathways. Immunity. 2011;35(4):445-55.
  5. Fourcade, et al. Upregulation of Tim-3 and PD-1 expression is associated with tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell dysfunction in melanoma patients. J Exp Med. 2010;207(10):2175-86.
  6. Gao et al. TIM-3 expression characterizes regulatory T cells in tumor tissues and is associated with lung cancer progression. PLOS One. 2012;7(2):e30676.
  7. Sakuishi et al. Targeting Tim-3 and PD-1 pathways to reverse T cell exhaustion and restore anti-tumor immunity. J Exp Med. 2010;207(10):2187-94.
  8. Nirschl et al. Molecular pathways: coexpression of immune checkpoint molecules: signaling pathways and implications for cancer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:4917e34.
  9. Ngiow et al. Prospects for TIM-3-targeted antitumour immunotherapy. Cancer Res 2011;71:6567e71.


Related posts

Organ-on-a-Chip: The Future of Improved Drug Discovery?

I’m a firm believer in the use of animal models in medical research. This is so for many reasons. A chemist and mentor of mine once said “to truly do drug...

First Stable, Serially Transplantable M5 AML PDX Model Published

It is traditionally difficult to develop stable blood cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Historically, commercially available models have been...