Good experimental design is key to accurate and precise drug development. Isotype control antibodies, designed and deployed properly, optimize study performance and data analysis in therapeutic antibody research.
What Are Isotype Control Antibodies?
Isotype control antibodies are negative controls used to accurately measure antibody drug effects and efficacy for in vitro and in vivo monoclonal antibody (mAb) studies. Isotype controls match the test/primary antibody characteristics, but are raised against antigens not found in common preclinical species; this means that isotype controls lack specificity for the target antigen.
In both in vivo and in vitro assays, a signal can result from various binding events. In order to accurately interpret assay results, it is critical to differentiate between binding events such as:
- mAb binding in an antigen-dependent specific manner.
- mAb binding in a non-antigen dependent manner, due to interaction with Fc receptors (FcR) or other proteins.
Isotype control antibodies provide an ideal negative control for mAb efficacy studies, enabling researchers to accurately distinguish between non-specific background and specific antibody signal.
Why Use Isotype Control Antibodies?
In general, antibodies are very similar to each other structurally. The majority of an antibody molecule is the “constant region”, where antibodies of the same isotype share amino acid sequences. This constant region helps to mediate the antibody mechanism of action (MOA) through binding to FcRs. Only a small, hypervariable region of the mAb actually determines antigen-specific binding and intended therapeutic effect.
When testing antibodies preclinically, you need to control for any variable that might impact the interpretation of study results. Mediation of MOA and engagement of immune cells via the constant and Fc regions can have an impact on mAb efficacy. Therefore, these factors need to be accounted for within study design.
Using a matched isotype negative control (with the same host species, isotype, conjugation, light chain, and concentration as the test/primary mAb) can account for these added variables and enable more precise data analysis. Simple negative controls like PBS cannot induce the same effects, potentially creating misleading data when compared to the test article.
How are Isotype Controls Important to Drug Development?
Isotype Controls Mimic Widespread FcR Engagement Effects
Isotype control antibodies are needed in in vivo efficacy assays to mimic the widespread FcR engagement that occurs via the Fc region of the test antibody. This engagement can induce effects which will only be properly analyzed when compared with an isotype control.
For example, when testing mAb in vivo efficacy in immuno-oncology research, different degrees of tumor growth inhibition (TGI) can be calculated depending on if an isotype control or PBS is used as a negative control. Therefore, comparison of the test antibody needs to be against an isotype control to make sure the antibody effect is not over- or underestimated.
Changes in tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) populations can also be observed when comparing negative controls (isotype control v. PBS). The extent of these changes varies by which model is used, making anticipation of the effect difficult during study design. Using an appropriate control is important for immunoprofiling and analysis of downstream results.
Isotype Controls Mimic FcR and Protein Staining for Flow Cytometry
In flow cytometry experiments, test antibodies can cause non-specific staining by binding to FcRs or other proteins. As FcR expression varies across tissue type, this non-specific staining can appear highly specific, confounding the results of your study. A matched isotype control should mimic this non-specific binding and staining, allowing more precise analysis than if PBS (which won’t bind) is used.
Matching isotype control antibodies for flow cytometry experiments can be technically tricky. All isotype control comparator molecules should be fully characterized before use to avoid producing misleading results. The negative controls should match:
- Heavy chain
- Light chain
- Fluorophore conjugation as required
With this level of complexity, there is often some debate over isotype controls being used in flow cytometry experiments.
Isotype Controls are Important Negative Controls for Immunohistochemistry Experiments
Alongside in vivo studies, negative controls are also needed for assays such as immunohistochemistry (IHC). Isotype controls are the perfect negative control, provided that primary antibody concentration and isotype are matched.
Direct secondary antibody staining, or staining with a polyclonal pool from the same species as the primary, are sometimes used as negative controls. However, neither is likely to match the primary antibody isotype or replicate primary antibody binding patterns in the tissue as well as an isotype control can.
If you stain with a secondary only, you run the risk of the antibody binding directly to the slide section rather than binding to the primary/isotype control. A secondary antibody alone would not be complexed to a primary antibody, so it could have altered antigen-independent binding properties. The secondary antibody isotype could also cause an obvious difference in staining due to interacting with resident FcRs (which vary across tissue types).
Staining with a polyclonal pool as a negative control brings a separate roster of issues. This introduces a mixture of immunoglobulins which may bind to varied and additional targets, increasing background and non-specific staining events.
Isotype control antibodies provide an ideal negative control for precise data analysis. Be sure to select a specifically designed and validated isotype control, which will provide a range of features and preferential qualities over more simple negative controls like PBS.