x

Oncology

Welcome to CrownBio’s Oncology Blog where we share our thoughts
on the latest trends and hot stories in Oncology

blog.png

The Latest Developments on PARP Inhibitors for Prostate Cancer Treatment

by Rekha Pal, PhD, December 3, 2020 at 01:00 PM

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in prostate cancer treatmentReview the status of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) for prostate cancer treatment, with a focus on recent developments in drug approvals and published data.

Rationale for PARP Inhibitors (PARPi) in Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is a clinically heterogeneous disease that is often driven by specific genomic alterations. Defects in DNA repair/DNA-damage response (DDR) pathways appear to be critical for increasing the risk of malignant transformation of the prostate. The enzymes PARP (poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase), BRCA 1/2 (BReast CAncer gene 1 and 2), and ATM (Ataxia-Telangiesctasia Mutated) all play important roles in the malignant transformation of prostate cells.

Drug developers are taking advantage of the concept of synthetic lethality to bring new drugs to prostate cancer patients. Synthetic lethality entails the simultaneous disruption of two genes, typically in the same pathway, which results in cellular death. This concept also works between genes and drugs, where one gene is inactivated by mutation and the other is inactivated by a drug. This approach has been successfully exploited in tumors harboring DDR defects, and this is the rationale behind the use of PARPi for prostate cancers with DDR defects.

Two Recent FDA PARPi Approvals for Prostate Cancer

Early in 2020, the FDA approved two PARPi for the treatment of prostate cancer—rucaparib (Rubraca®) and olaparib (Lynparza®)—both of which were shown to delay cancer progression in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Rucaparib, which gained accelerated approval, was the first of the two PARPi approved and is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with mCRPC who have a deleterious BRCA mutation (germline and/or somatic) and were previously treated with androgen receptor-directed therapy and a taxane-based chemotherapy. The approval for rucaparib was supported by a multicenter, single arm trial known as “TRITON2” which enrolled patients with mCRPC and a deleterious BRCA mutation. The study reported a 44% overall response rate (which was similar for patients with germline or somatic BRCA mutations), and a 55% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate that was higher in patients with a BRCA2 alteration.

Shortly after the rucapaib approval, the FDA announced the approval of olaparib based on data from the PROfound clinical trial which evaluated olaparib versus Xtandi (enzalutamide) or Zytiga (abiraterone) in men with mCRPC who had progressed on prior treatment and had a qualifying genetic mutation in at least one of fifteen prespecified genes involved in the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway (e.g. BRCA1/2, ATM and CDK12). The study showed that olaparib delayed cancer progression in comparison to the control therapies in patients with BRCA1/2 or ATM gene mutations.

>
DRUG FDA APPROVAL DATA APPROVED INDICATION BIOMARKERS
Rucaparib
Clovis Oncology
May 15, 2020 Adult patients with a deleterious BRCA mutation (germline and/or somatic)-associated mCRPC who have been treated with androgen receptor-directed therapy and a taxane-based chemotherapy. BRCA1, BRCA2 (germline or somatic)
Olaparib
AstraZeneca
May 19, 2020 Adult patients with deleterious or suspected deleterious germline or somatic HRR gene-mutated mCRPC, who have progressed following prior treatment with enzalutamide or abiraterone. Germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 or
somatic mutation in: 
ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BARD1, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK2, CHEK2, FANCL, PALB2, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, RAD54L


Recent Developments in PARPi for Prostate Cancer

As a follow-up to the initial PROfound trial results discussed above, a survival analysis published in September (2020) showed that the delay in cancer progression was associated with a significant increase in overall survival in mCRPC patients who had tumors with at least one alteration in BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM. Therefore, the PROfound study showed that olaparib not only reduces the risk of disease progression, but also extends survival.

These findings may alter the treatment paradigm for patients with mCRPC who can be stratified based on their BRCA1, BRCA2 or ATM status. Overall, this precision medicine study solidifies the view that stratification of patients based on validated biomarkers can deliver remarkable results for patients.

Ongoing PARPi Clinical Trials in Prostate Cancer

Clinical trials of PARPi in mCRPC are ongoing and include the following:

  • PROpel [Olaparib]: This is a Phase III trial, with first data expected in 2021. The study is testing olaparib as a 1st-line medicine in a genetically unselected mCRPC patient population in combination with abiraterone versus abiraterone alone.

  • TALAPRO- 1 [Talazoparib]: This is an open-label, Phase II trial evaluating talazoparib in mCRPC patients with DDR alterations who have received 1–2 chemotherapy regimens (≥1 taxane-based) for metastatic disease and progressed on ≥1 novel hormonal therapy. According to preliminary data presented at the virtual ASCO 2020 meeting, 86 patients among the DDR-deficient population were evaluable for efficacy response, and overall ORR was 26.7% of which a confirmed ORR of 41.5% was found in patients with BRCA1/2 alterations, and 40.5% for patients with BRCA2 alterations.

  • TRITON3 [Rucaparib]: This is an open-label Phase III trial comparing rucaparib with physician’s choice of therapy [abiraterone (Zytiga), enzalutamide (Xtandi), or docetaxel] in patients with mCRPC associated with a HRR gene defect. All patients had progressed on prior androgen receptor-directed therapy but are chemotherapy naïve.

  • MAGNITUDE [Niraparib]: This is a Phase III trial evaluating niraparib in combination with abiraterone and prednisone in adults with mCRPC. The MAGNITUDE study is evaluating niraparib in a broader mCRPC patient population as compared to the ongoing GALAHAD Phase II study that is evaluating niraparib in patients with mCRPC and DNA repair defects with disease progression after taxane and androgen receptor-targeted therapy. Preliminary data for GALAHAD indicate that in BRCA patients, the ORR is 41% with a median duration of objective response of 5.5 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in BRCA patients were 8.2 and 12.6 months, respectively. In addition, QUEST is a Phase 1b/2 study of niraparib combination therapies for the treatment of mCRPC which is also ongoing.

Challenges with PARPi for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer

Even with the current approvals, there are several challenges that must be overcome to enable the optimal use of PARPi in mCRPC. These include:

  • Resolving concerns related to the diagnostic test(s) for detecting HRR gene defects.

  • Developing a better understanding of the efficacy of different PARPi in relation to specific mutations, which will enable PARPi to be better targeted to specific patient populations.

  • Developing a better understanding of differences in germline versus somatic mutations in the context of PARPi.

  • Developing a better understanding of acquired resistance to PARPi and exploring other non-PARPi treatment strategies.

  • Establishing the rationale for when PARPi should be used as a monotherapy versus in combination with other drugs.

Conclusion

PARP inhibitors are exciting and novel precision therapeutics for prostate cancer, that have recently achieved two FDA approvals for the mCRPC indication. The benefits of PARPi in mCRPC is becoming increasingly clear with the recent additional data, but there remain several challenges which need to be overcome to maximize the right patient receiving the right PARPi based on their specific genomic profile.


Author


Related posts

Preclinical Models for Bispecific T Cell Engager Development

Last month we hosted a webinar with Dr. Ludovic Bourré, Senior Director of Scientific Engagement at CrownBio, focused on the next generation of preclinical...

Ask the Expert: Organoid and Immune Cell Co-Cultures

Dr Yujun Huang, Senior Director Immuno-Oncology at CrownBio, answers the most popular questions from his recent organoids and immune cell co-cultures webinar

For the Children: Advancing the Cause of Pediatric Cancer Research

Why are cancer treatments for children lagging behind the latest advancements in clinical oncology? CrownBio Director Mike Batey takes a closer look at...

CVMD-Poster-.jpg